This content was created by Maren Ehlers. The last update was by Kate McDonald.
Bodies and Structures 2.0: Deep-Mapping Modern East Asian HistoryMain MenuGet to Know the SiteGuided TourShow Me HowA click-by-click guide to using this siteModulesRead the seventeen spatial stories that make up Bodies and Structures 2.0Tag MapExplore conceptsComplete Grid VisualizationDiscover connectionsGeotagged MapFind materials by geographic locationLensesCreate your own visualizationsWhat We LearnedLearn how multivocal spatial history changed how we approach our researchAboutFind information about contributors and advisory board members, citing this site, image permissions and licensing, and site documentationTroubleshootingA guide to known issuesAcknowledgmentsThank youDavid Ambaras1337d6b66b25164b57abc529e56445d238145277Kate McDonald306bb1134bc892ab2ada669bed7aecb100ef7d5fThis project was made possible in part by a major grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities.
Map of Fukui town
1media/anseiezu (2)_thumb.jpg2020-12-15T12:05:25-05:00Maren Ehlers18502c6775e5db37b999ee7b08c8c075867ca31d3531856plain2021-07-23T19:47:02-04:001856Fukui City History Museum (Fukui Shiritsu Kyōdo Rekishi Hakubutsukan).20100602100712+0900Fukui City History Museum (Fukui Shiritsu Kyōdo Rekishi Hakubutsukan).Used with permission.Maren EhlersME-0040Kate McDonald306bb1134bc892ab2ada669bed7aecb100ef7d5f
Though Fukui's vaccinators were interested in expanding the town-based system of vaccinations, they were also highly conscious of the risks posed by such expansion. In early 1851, when the vaccine was on the verge of extinction, town officials for the first time raised the idea of vaccination tours to the countryside to treat the rural population, presumably as a way to keep the vaccine in circulation [Ban 1986, 161-163]. Kasahara, however, initially rejected the idea. He argued that conditions in the countryside would make it difficult to transfer the vaccine every seventh day. He reminded the town officials that distances between villages were too long to reliably “connect the lymph” (tōbyō tsunagi-tome), and warned that the vaccine would go extinct if even one transfer day went unused due to bad weather and other complications. He also pointed out that there were not enough vaccinators available to go into the villages. Fukui's entire chapter might have to go on tour, and that meant that one missed transfer day would extinguish the entire vaccine supply in the domain. In other words, the combination of long distances, low population density, time sensitivity, and the small overall number of vaccinators made rural expeditions a risky endeavor. It was safer to concentrate resources in the castle town for the time being.
To better understand Kasahara's preference for bundling resources in the castle town, learn about a cautionary tale of vaccinators in Saga Domain.
The record of a wealthy peasant household from the village of Futsukaichi suggests that in 1865, about fifteen years after the introduction of the vaccine to Fukui, rural people were still sending their children to town to get them vaccinated [Yanagisawa 2019, p. 58-59]. Futsukaichi was located in the Sakai district between Fukui and the port town of Mikuni, which was part of Fukui domain (for locations, click the pins on the map on top of the page). In 1865, there seem to have been one vaccination clinic each in Fukui and Mikuni, the latter probably run by Mikuni town doctors with support from local wealthy merchant donors. In 1865, the household in Futsukaichi sent three girls and one boy to town to be vaccinated. The three girls went to Fukui the day before vaccination in the company of servants and stayed with relatives overnight. They returned the next day, but went to Fukui again seven days later to get reexamined and to supply vaccines to other children. The boy, on the other hand, was taken to Mikuni. It is unclear whether the children's gender had anything to do with the difference in the circumstances of their treatment.