This site requires Javascript to be turned on. Please enable Javascript and reload the page.

Bodies and Structures 2.0: Deep-Mapping Modern East Asian History

References for "Cai Peihuo's Inner Territory"

Barclay, Paul D. 2017. Outcasts of Empire: Japan's Rule on Taiwan's Savage Border, 1874-1945. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2017.

Cai Peihuo. 1928. Nihon honkokumin ni atau. Tokyo: Taiwan mondai kenkyujo.

Chen, Edward I-te. 1972. “Formosan Political Movements Under Japanese Rule.” Journal of Asian Studies 31, no. 3: 477-97.

Fujitani, Takashi. 2011. Race for Empire: Koreans as Japanese and Japanese as Americans during World War II. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Go Kōmei. 1994. “Kindai Nihon no Taiwan ninshiki: ‘Taiwan kyōkai kaihō’ ‘Tōyō jihō’ o chūshin ni.” In Kindai Nihon no Ajia ninshiki, edited by Furuya Tetsuo, 211-41. Kyoto: Kyoto daigaku jinbun kagaku kenkyūjo.

Heylen, Ann. 2010. “Reflections on Becoming Educated in Colonial Taiwan.” In Becoming Taiwan: From Colonialism to Democracy, edited by Ann Heylen and Scott Sommers, 149–64. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.

Heylen, Ann. “2007. An Excursion into Cai Peihuo's Colonial Diary, 1929-36.” Journal of Chinese Overseas 3, no. 2: 239-62.

Komagome Takeshi. 2015. Sekaishi no naka no Taiwan shokuminchi shihai. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.

Kwon, Nayoung Aimee. 2015. Intimate Empire: Collaboration and Colonial Modernity in Korea and Japan. Durham: Duke University Press.

Lamley, Harry J. 1998. “Taiwan under Japanese Rule, 1895-1945.” In Taiwan: A New History, edited by Murray A. Rubenstein, 201-60. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.

Matsuda Toshihiko. 1995. Senzenki no zainichi Chôsenjin to sanseiken. Tokyo: Akashi shoten.

McDonald, Kate. 2017. Placing Empire: Travel and the Social Imagination in Imperial Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press.

O’Dwyer, Emer. 2015. Significant Soil: Settler Colonialism and Japan’s Urban Empire in Manchuria. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Asia Center.

Oguma, Eiji. 2017. The Boundaries of “The Japanese”: Korea, Taiwan and the Ainu, 1868-1945. Translated by Leonie R. Stickland. Melbourne: TransPacific Press.

Oguma Eiji. 1998. “Nihonjin” no kyōkai: Okinawa Ainu Taiwan Chōsen shokuminchi shihai kara fukki undō made. Tokyo: Shin’yōsha.

Scruggs, Bert M. 2015. Translingual Narration: Colonial and Postcolonial Taiwanese Fiction and Film. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.

Taiwan sōtokufu. 1927. Taiwan tetsudō ryokō annai. Taihoku: Taiwan sōtokufu.

Taiwan tsūshi kenkyūkai. 2014. “Shiryō shōkai: Lian Heng no ‘Taiwan tsūshi’ yakuchū.” Teikyō shigaku 29: 137-236.

Thornber, Karen. 2009. Empire of Texts in Motion: Chinese, Korean, and Taiwanese Transculturations of Japanese Literature. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia Center, 2009.

Uchida, Jun. 2011. Brokers of Empire: Japanese Settler Colonialism in Korea, 1876-1945. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Asia Center.

Wada Hirobumi, Jingbo Xu, Jejin Yu, and Yokoji Keiko, eds. 2017. “Ikyō toshite no Nihon: Higashi Ajia no ryūgakusei no mita kindai Nihon. Tokyo: Bensei Shuppan.

Yanaihara Tadao. 1929. Teikokushugika no Taiwan. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.

Yen, Chuan-ying. 2007. “The Demise of Oriental-Style Painting in Taiwan.” In Refracted Modernity: Visual Culture and Identity in Colonial Taiwan, edited by Yuko Kikuchi, 83-110. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

Yŏm Sangsŏp. 2010. “On the Eve of the Uprising” (Mansejŏn). In On the Eve of the Uprising and Other Stories from Colonial Korea, translated by Sunyoung Park, with Jefferson J. A. Gattrall, 5-111. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Young, Louise. 2013. Beyond the Metropolis: Second Cities and Modern Life in Interwar Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press.

This page has paths:

Contents of this path:

This page is referenced by:

Cai Peihuo's Inner Territory
“I am very disappointed in the 180,000 people of the mother country who have moved to Taiwan – the bureaucrats, the people, the propertied and propertyless…. But I have great trust and hope in the masses of the Japanese metropole.”
Thus begins Cai Peihuo's (蔡培火) 1928 manifesto, Nihon honkokumin ni atau (To the people of the Japanese metropole). The manifesto introduced metropolitan Japanese readers to the discriminatory structures, policies, and practices that constrained the lives of Taiwanese Chinese and indigenous people in Taiwan. Cai published it in 1928, three years after the passage of the Universal Suffrage Act and on the eve of the first national post-universal suffrage election in the metropole. He spoke directly to the newly enfranchised masses: granting self-rule for Taiwan was the only reasonable response to the inequities of colonial rule.
Judged from the perspective of Cai’s own goals, the manifesto did not have its intended impact. Newly enfranchised Japanese voters did not take to the polls to reform the uneven structure of the Japanese Empire. Instead, in the years following the manifesto’s publication, the central government fixed the empire even more firmly in place. Imperial rhetoric that envisaged the eventual assimilation of Taiwan into Japan gave way. By the 1930s, the dominant narrative of Japan-Taiwan relations emphasized the immutable cultural difference between the two peoples.
The manifesto tells a tale larger than its failure, however. 1928 marked a watershed moment in the history of the Japanese Empire. The year of the first post-universal (male) suffrage election for seats in the Imperial Diet, it was also the first national election in which voting rights were determined by place of residence. Such a change created new opportunities for anticolonial liberal movements, which in Korea drew common cause with Japanese colonial residents against the exclusion of colonial residents from the franchise. It also lent new power to direct appeals to the Japanese voting public. Anticolonial populist appeals challenged the power of the “vested interests” of state and capital over ordinary people in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. Nihon honkokumin ni atau is one such example.
This module explores Nihon honkokumin ni atau in three ways — as a story of anticolonial activism between metropole and colony; as an act of settler colonialism; and as an artifact of colonial mobility. The main pathway analyzes how Cai used imaginative geography to construct a claim for self rule in Taiwan that would appeal to Japanese people in the metropole. Sub-pathways unfold to illuminate the blind spots in Cai’s own imaginative geography, and to show how the circumstances behind the manifesto’s production shaped Cai’s contradictory message about the relationship between spatial identity and political freedom in the Japanese Empire. Shying away from a demand for independence and ignoring the dehumanizing violence of the colonial state’s dispossession of indigenous peoples, Cai’s argument for self rule in Taiwan never escaped the logic of empire.

Click here for a list of references for this module, which is also available from the module's Conclusion page.
Cover images: Cai Peihuo, Wikimedia Commons; "Route of a Tour of Inspection," East Asia Digital Image Collection, image ip0380, Lafayette College Libraries, Easton, PA.