Bodies and Structures 2.0: Deep-Mapping Modern East Asian HistoryMain MenuGet to Know the SiteGuided TourShow Me HowA click-by-click guide to using this siteModulesRead the seventeen spatial stories that make up Bodies and Structures 2.0Tag MapExplore conceptsComplete Grid VisualizationDiscover connectionsGeotagged MapFind materials by geographic locationLensesCreate your own visualizationsWhat We LearnedLearn how multivocal spatial history changed how we approach our researchAboutFind information about contributors and advisory board members, citing this site, image permissions and licensing, and site documentationTroubleshootingA guide to known issuesAcknowledgmentsThank youDavid Ambaras1337d6b66b25164b57abc529e56445d238145277Kate McDonald306bb1134bc892ab2ada669bed7aecb100ef7d5fThis project was made possible in part by a major grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities.
Borders
12019-11-27T22:42:55-05:00Evan Dawley7a40080bd5bb656cee837d5befaa3ea8e7a2ac44353This is where I explain how I define and use borders in the module.plain2020-04-27T18:01:31-04:00Kate McDonald306bb1134bc892ab2ada669bed7aecb100ef7d5fBorders are features of imaginary geography, because they exist only insofar as people conceive of them, although they can be marked by physical manifestations, such as checkpoints, fences, and walls. In this regard, national borders have much in common with the earthly manifestations of sacred geography, such as temples or the routes of religious processions. In the context of this module, that resemblance becomes much stronger, because the most important border—those between the Taiwanese and Japanese ethno-religious communities—existed within Taiwan, and within the urban terrain of Jilong. That border became much more rigid than the fuzzier, frequently crossed boundary between sacred and profane. However, it only became that way; the key point here is that borders are historical constructions. They are not natural, nor do they exist a priori, but they are formed through historical processes of definition and contestation. This module follows one process of border construction, re-construction, and transgression. In this regard it has much in common with other modules that chart the creation, crossing, and/or non-recognition of borders, such as Mitch Aso, Maren Ehlers, and Nathaniel Isaacson, who examine the spread of ideas and technologies across recognized, borders; Peter Thilly, who looks at the similar movement of an illicit commodity; and Sakura Christmas, who provides a totalizing perspective that disregards borders.
This page has paths:
12019-11-27T22:24:41-05:00Evan Dawley7a40080bd5bb656cee837d5befaa3ea8e7a2ac44DefinitionsEvan Dawley3This thread addresses the key terms used in the module.plain2019-11-27T23:05:20-05:00Evan Dawley7a40080bd5bb656cee837d5befaa3ea8e7a2ac44