Bodies and Structures 2.0: Deep-Mapping Modern East Asian HistoryMain MenuGet to Know the SiteGuided TourShow Me HowA click-by-click guide to using this siteModulesRead the seventeen spatial stories that make up Bodies and Structures 2.0Tag MapExplore conceptsComplete Grid VisualizationDiscover connectionsGeotagged MapFind materials by geographic locationLensesCreate your own visualizationsWhat We LearnedLearn how multivocal spatial history changed how we approach our researchAboutFind information about contributors and advisory board members, citing this site, image permissions and licensing, and site documentationTroubleshootingA guide to known issuesAcknowledgmentsThank youDavid Ambaras1337d6b66b25164b57abc529e56445d238145277Kate McDonald306bb1134bc892ab2ada669bed7aecb100ef7d5fThis project was made possible in part by a major grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities.
U.S. ARMY CHEMICAL CORPS "THE CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL RADIOLOGICAL STORY"; CHEMICAL WARFARE 70464
12020-08-09T10:42:53-04:00Michitake Asoc957806dd05559bbe07c540e9ab4cd46aae194d3351Presented by the U.S. Army and its Chemical Corps, The Chemical Biological Radiation Story (M.F.3 9027) shows viewers how the U.S. army is developing its ...plain2020-08-09T10:42:53-04:00YouTube2019-04-03T16:30:10ZPeriscopeFilmhF5dxew5YCAMichitake Asoc957806dd05559bbe07c540e9ab4cd46aae194d3
This page is referenced by:
12020-08-01T16:36:40-04:00Beijing Conference on Biological Warfare10Path A page 3plain2020-08-11T18:28:13-04:00North Korea, China, Vietnam, United States, Soviet Union, Fort Detrick, Maryland1951-1990sMichitake AsoIn December 1952 and January 1953, Việt Minh representatives attended a series of lectures and an exhibition in Beijing [double check] where they learned the specifics of biological weapons use in North Korea and northeast China. A simplified version of this information is presented in a Việt Minh pamphlet but the reports collected at this time were extremely detailed and the transcripts and summaries run to over 200 pages.
Chinese scientists and medical doctors emphasized the need for careful research and laid out three reasons they suspected the United States and United Nations militaries of using germ warfare:
Diseases that broke out were new to area and time of year;
Unusual insects and materials served as vectors;
Outbreaks happened after US airplanes flew by.
These scientists also pointed to the context of the US biological weapons program. They could draw on information available to the US public as shown in the following propaganda film about the US military's chemical, biological, and radiological weapons programs.
In fact, one of the terms used at the Beijing conference to describe biological weapons, “bacteriology upside down,” came from Theodor Rosebury, one of the founders of the US's World War II biological weapons program. In 1949, Rosebury publishedPeace or Pestilence? Biological Warfare and How to Avoid It that warned against the use of these weapons and used the phrase “bacteriology upside down” as the title of chapter four.
Finally, the Beijing conference reports argue that patriotic hygiene mass movement was a good way to counter effects of biological warfare. All of these themes were picked up by the Việt Minh in their own investigations. This report is contained in the Ministry of Health file 5402 held in the National Archives of Vietnam Center 3 (NAV3).
While the existence of both an offensive and defensive biological weapons program at Fort Detrick, MD was no secret, the use of biological warfare during the Korean War has been denied by US leaders. From Soviet Union documents made available in the 1990s, it appears that Chinese and Soviet scientists helped fabricate evidence of US biological weapons use. These documents show that some Chinese and Soviet officials knew that North Korean charges of biological warfare were false propaganda. The first notes from Soviet officials stating that the specific evidence for germ warfare in North Korea and northeast China was weak and had possibly been fabricated came in April 1953, over a year after the alleged use of germ warfare. A Soviet cable to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) from 1 April 1953 states, for example, "the North Koreans, with the assistance of our advisers, created false areas of exposure. In June-July 1952," it continues, "a delegation of specialists in bacteriology from the World Peace Council arrived in North Korea. Two false areas of exposure were prepared." Documents from later that April suggest that North Koreans were fabricating charges made as early as 1951.
On 2 May 1953, soon after top Soviet leaders learned of this fabrication, they called for a halt to further investigation into the charges. In terms of biological weapons use in the First Indochina War, Việt Minh leaders had no reason to suspect before this time that the charges leveled against the Americans were false. They had gained their information about germ warfare late the previous year and had already started to investigate similar suspected used of biological weapons in northern Vietnam.
For more on Chinese and North Korean charges of US biological warfare, see the work of Ruth Rogaski.
12020-08-09T11:18:48-04:00Vectors of Invasion5Path C side path on pamphletplain2020-08-11T18:39:29-04:0039.441169, -77.4243561946-1954Michitake Aso
How believable were the charges that the French used biological weapons during the First Indochina War?