This site requires Javascript to be turned on. Please enable Javascript and reload the page.

Bodies and Structures 2.0: Deep-Mapping Modern East Asian History

Boundaries

Boundaries are material and imaginative divisions of space and place. Boundaries are events that construct the social world in explicitly spatial terms, as in this is the boundary between “here” and “there”; and the spatial world in explicitly social terms, as in these people belong “here” and those people don’t belong “there.” As Casey observes, “Rather than being the zone in which human action gives out or comes to an end, the boundary is precisely where it intensifies: where it comes to happen in the most effective or significant sense” (2007, 508-509).

In Conversation with Other Crossings

All Bodies and Structures Crossings and tags invoke “Boundaries” in some way. As assemblages of human and non-human actors and objects, Environments may be relatively bounded (e.g., a laboratory) or unbounded (e.g., an oceanic zone), or may straddle other types of boundaries. Rationalities operate by producing their own boundaries between life and death (vital), connected and isolated (network), and classified and unclassified -- or perhaps known/knowable and unknown/unknowable (taxonomic). Figures emerge in relation to bounded spatial imaginaries (e.g., the invader, settler, native, or stranger; the gendered figure in relation to conceptions of inside/outside; or the mediator or gatekeeper as derived from points of transition); while Flows and Immobilities both condition and are conditioned by the development of boundaries. Vehicles convey people, things, and ideas across boundaries, translating between bounded zones as they move. Similarly, as ways of representing and othering spaces, places, and peoples, Imaginative Geographies produce and rely on boundaries.

What makes Boundaries distinct as a tag is its focus on the type of spatial inscription of the imagined division. That is, “Borders,” “Borderlands,” and “Thresholds” each invoke a distinct spatial relationship between “here” and “there.” With “Borders,” the line is distinct, though constantly subject to contestation and change. With “Borderlands,” there is a mixing, a Venn diagram of here and there, but the presence of the border is a condition of subjectivity for those inhabiting or invested in the borderland. For Thresholds, the space (and the subject who occupies it/constitutes it) is defined by what it emerges into. The threshold of the house, for example; or, the threshold of the river.

References

Casey, Edward S. “Boundary, Place, and Event in the Spatiality of History.” Rethinking History 11, no. 4 (2007): 507–12.

This page has tags:

Contents of this tag:

Contents of this tag:

This page is referenced by:

Conclusion: Water as a Contested Space
“Constructing a Water Town” examines the spatial history of water surrounding Wenzhou, a southeast Chinese city with extensive familiarity with water. It explores the evolution of canals, seawalls, and the Wenruitang River. It also examines how water influenced the life of local communities and served as a site, and tool, for actors to manipulate local politics and social relations. Drawing on an array of images and texts, this module shows how water shaped Wenzhou society and how local communities, in turn, structured the water spaces. As this module demonstrates, the competing powers and villages across the Wenzhou Plain had formed an arena, through constant adaptation and negotiation, in which local actors manipulated the ways of approaching and dealing with waters.
Similar to the modules of Shellen X. Wu and Hiroko Matsuda, this module considers the waters in Wenzhou as boundaries that demarcate and connect places, people, and social practices. Using the examples of the “tang” river system, dragon boat races, the “sending off a boat” ritual, and smuggling and piracy, this module demonstrates that water in Wenzhou draws borderlines between various realms of social life, including the new and old (cultivation) lands, the ritual and non-ritual alliances among communities, the clean and ill/polluted realms of life before and after plague-expulsion ceremonies, and the legal and illegal trades and activities surrounding the waters.
Moreover, as Edward S. Casey also points out, “Rather than being the zone in which human action gives out or comes to an end, the boundary is precisely where it intensifies: where it comes to happen in the most effective or significant sense.” Water in Wenzhou, in this sense, becomes an important arena where actions and historical events intensified, and thus creates a significant space wherein regimes and local actors constantly negotiated regional order and socio-political relations. Ergo, as this module argues, water as a contested zone in Wenzhou society did not merely determine how local actors perceived, responded, and manipulated matters associated with water; it also facilitated encounters, confrontations, and negotiations between different sectors and realms within the society.