The Postwar and the Reconsecration/Reinforcement of Sacred Space
The most dramatic example of reconsecration, of redrawing the sacred geography by overwriting a piece of Japanese sacred space, concerned the Jilong Shrine. By late in 1946, the new Jilong municipal government decided to transform the location into a Shrine to the National Martyrs (Zhonglie ci), and budgeted 60,000 yuan for the project, as briefly noted in an article in Minbao, one of the first Chinese-language newspapers to begin publishing in Taiwan after the end of the Japanese era:
This decision paralleled one taken in Taipei, where the Taiwan Shrine--which had been consecrated to Japan's war dead late in the Pacific War--was designated the Taiwan Province Shrine to the National Martyrs. That plan was never fulfilled--the Taiwan Shrine is now the Yuanshan Grand Hotel--but similar acts occurred in Tainan and Taoyuan. In Jilong, at least, this reconsecration seems to have held little significance for local residents: although the Martyrs' Shrine is maintained in good order, the most frequent visitors seem to be feral dogs, and it takes some hunting through the underbrush to locate the stone dogs donated a century ago by Japanese businessmen that stand as the main reminders of what the site used to be. Yet, the significance of the Japanese colonial period for Taiwan's sacred geography is far more important than these relics and repurposed spaces: the map of that terrain was substantially drawn between 1895 and 1945, when Jilong reached its apogee of urban significance.Jilong city is planning to construct a Shrine to the National Martyrs' and is selecting a site for the location. Today it decided to use the original location of the Jilong Shrine, with a cost currently estimated at 60,000 yuan.
Since that time, the map has been redrawn, and the sacred geography has become much more densely filled with new sites. The tremendous quantity of such locations, in Jilong and across Taiwan, came into existence after 1945, with the real explosion beginning in the late 1960s. At that time, the KMT regime launched a program to distinguish the Republic of China from the People's Republic of China. The latter had launched its Cultural Revolution, with its fearsome attacks on all manifestations of old culture, including temples, thus the former was to become the bastion of true, traditional Chinese culture. The KMT's project of sacred reterritorialization failed, like the Japanese one before it, because the people who created and supported this remarkable surge in temple construction in fact replicated a key method of identity expression developed to resist Japanese colonization. The difference, and the reason for the tremendous density of sacred spaces covering a much greater area of the physical terrain, was that state policies now encouraged rather then suppressed the act. The Sinicizing goal, however, was overwhelmed by the expansion of Taiwanese sacred geography.
You have reached the end of this module. Please return to the beginning and chart a new route through it.